For the third time this week, the execution of CT serial killer Michael Ross has been delayed, this time by a perhaps unprecedented set of circumstances. His attorney, T.R. Paulding, is himself against the death penalty. However, that brought him personally close to Ross, and when the death row inmate begged him last year to do everything possible to make sure he died rather than to extend his life in virtual isolation, Paulding agreed.
Paulding helped clear away obstacles posed by anti-death penalty advocates. But earlier this week, Federal District Court Judge Robert Chatigny stayed the execution, set for Jan. 26, suspecting that the conditions on Connecticut's death row were such that they may have put Ross in an irrational frame of mind when he asked Paulding to help him. The U.S. Supreme Court later in the week overturned a U.S. Court of Appeals ruling that had upheld Chatigny, and ultimately, his death was rescheduled for 2:01 a.m. this morning.
But, in another bizarre twist, Chatigny called Paulding Friday afternoon, charging that the attorney had failed to determine independently if Ross was in his right mind when he asked Paulding for help. The judge said if a post-execution investigation found he wasn't, he personally would take steps to remove Paulding's license to practice law. Paulding, on his own, sought and obtained a stay of execution until Monday at 9 p.m. while he responds to the judge's concerns.
Ross was arrested in 1984 for strangling eight girls and young women, some of whom he raped. The drama attending the conviction and imprisonment of this 45-year-old Cornell graduate has transfixed the State of Connecticut since. Adding to the tension is the fact that the state would become the first New England state in 45 years to use the death penalty.
For those who feel the need for arguments for and against the death penalty, HW seeks to draw some lessons from the past and recommends the following sources:
The Death Penalty Information Center is a clearinghouse for the latest news about pending death penalty cases, opinion pieces, and analyzes grouped topically, such as "costs," "mental retardation," and "women." One particularly detailed section covers the history of the death penalty, back to the 1600s.
Pro-DeathPenalty.com offers a compendium of articles, books and tapes promoting the death penalty and a death watch of scheduled executions. It's a take-no-prisoners site, which wears its heart on its sleeve. Commenting on the TV drama, The Exonerated, it comments: "This is strictly an anti-victim, pro-criminal play and is a tragic violation of trust with the public and victims of violent crime."
On the other end of the spectrum is the Campaign to End the Death Penalty, which is equally strident, offering such talking points as "Five Reasons to Oppose the Death Penalty."
Stuart Banner's The Death Penalty: An American History is a richly detailed examination of how capital punishment came to be and of its ebbs and flows in popularity across the centuries. Richard Posner, writing in the New Republic, says "Stuart Banner's book is fine and balanced and important. His lucid history of this grim subject is scrupulously accurate."
The National Archives' Learning Curve reports that prior to the 1927 execution of Sacco and Vanzetti, some 250,000 people staged a death-watch vigil. Though the issues involved are widely different, it is notable that a prayer vigil for Michael Ross Friday evening drew only about 100. And yet The Hartford Courant filled six pages of news and sidebars on the gripping execution runup and reportedly issued a special edition to add post-deadline developments.
On one thing, the pros and antis can agree: the debate over capital punishment is becoming more heated than ever before and promises to remain a burning national issue for a good long time.